The Real Reason For The Gardasil Vaccine Push
We always wondered why Merck’s HPV vaccine, known as Gardasil, was of such interest to politicians…why it was so aggressively marketed as a cervical cancer vaccine, and why it was so widely recommended by doctors despite being fraught with controversy relating to its addressable market, efficacy, and the safety of its ingredients such as aluminum. In February 2007, Texas Governor Rick Perry tried to mandate the vaccine with an executive order for young girls to be vaccinated in schools. The fallout from Monday’s debate among Republican presidential candidates has revealed some interesting answers as to why this vaccine was so heavily pushed onto our population of young girls.
During their debate which aired on CNN in September 2011, Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann lashed out at Rick Perry regarding the pushing of Gardasil. “To have innocent little 12-year-old girls be forced to have a government injection through an executive order is just flat out wrong,” she said, and then claimed that Gardasil producer Merck & Co. employed Mike Toomey, Perry’s former chief of staff, as a lobbyist in Texas, and that the drug company had donated to Perry’s campaigns. Perry’s response was a false statement that he only received a $5,000 contribution from Merck. “”It was a $5,000 contribution that I had received from them…I raise about $30 million. And if you’re saying that I can be bought for $5,000, I’m offended.”
However Perry’s campaigns have in fact received nearly $30,000 from Merck since 2000, mostly occurring before he issued his order, according to a Washington Post report. Merck also donated money to an organization called Women in Government, which was led by state Rep. Dianne White Delisi in Texas, who was the Chair of the House public health committee and also the mother-in-law of Perry’s chief of staff at the time. CBS news reported today that internal government emails show Perry’s staff working closely with Merck lobbyists on the vaccine mandate. Phone calls, faxes, emails, lunches and meetings occurred between Perry’s staff and Merck starting in 2006, just two months after Gardasil got approved. Since Merck receives $494.85 from insurers for each girl vaccinated with Gardasil, its incentives to bribe politicians to enforce mandatory vaccinations are obvious, yet not excusable, and they leave us to wonder how many other drugs and vaccines have been pushed onto unknowing populations in this manner.
The promotion of Gardasil by politicians is problematic because of the bribery and lies that target a young, uneducated population, particularly in light of the vaccine’s questionable safety and efficacy. Firstly, we are concerned with the safety of Gardasil because it contains the aluminum hydroxide adjuvant which is a neurotoxin that has been shown in labs to induce “both behavioral and motor deficits and the loss of motor neurons and increased presence of astrocytes (cells that express inflammatory markers) in spinal cord and neuronal apoptosis (cell death) in the primary motor cortex” according to a 2009 study published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry by Professor Chris Shaw. The authors of the study conclude that “overall, the results reported here mirror previous work that has clearly demonstrated that aluminum, in both oral and injected forms, can be neurotoxic.” The accumulation of aluminum in the body has long been linked to Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s and other forms of dimentia. Gardasil contains 225 mcg of aluminum in each shot for a total dose of 675 mcg of aluminum. The vaccine also contains Polysorbate 80, which has been linked to infertility and is a suspected carcinogen cited in one particular study to have “equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity for polysorbate 80 in male rats” (see references below for all study citations).
We also have concerns over the vaccine’s efficacy and its supposed cervical cancer indication. The Gardasil vaccine does not directly prevent cancer, despite that it is marketed as doing so. Calling it a cervical cancer vaccine is false, it is a vaccine against the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), a sexually transmitted disease. Furthermore, the impact it can have on further reducing cancer incidence in an already low-risk population (such as young girls in the United States) is minimal. It protects against 4 of the 200 HPV strains and only two of the four targeted strains are known to cause cervical cancer. Since its approval, Gardasil has been given to girls as young as 6 and 8 years old who have been told it is a means to prevent cancer. The immunity it provides eventually wears off, leaving girls vulnerable to HPV again years later when they may be most in need of the STD protection.
The risk of contracting these two deadly strains of HPV and the risk of developing cervical cancer is low for females in the U.S. because the screening procedures for cervical cancer are so widely implemented that there is little need to take additional precautionary measures. The incidence of cervical cancer in the US is approximately 8 cases per 100,000 women. “The very best you could achieve with Gardasil alone would be 14 cases per 100,000 women. So in an overall population, Gardasil is never going to prevent more cervical cancers than you are already preventing with a screening program,” says Diane Harper, a Professor of Medicine at the University of Missouri in Kansas City, who led the clinical trials of Gardasil and its main competitor, Cevarix. 4,000 American women die of cervical cancer each year, which represents 0.001% of the US population. Given the 18,727 incidents of side effects reported amongst the 35 million vaccinated (0.05% of the vaccinated population), and the fact that there are likely many side effects yet to be officially reported, we conclude that avoiding the Gardasil vaccine is the safest choice. We also warn against any doctor that promotes this vaccine, for similar reasons outlined above.
Our goal is to increase public awareness about vaccine safety. We can demand safer ingredients in our vaccines, as we have already seen the development of several mercury-free vaccines in response to the public outrage over the common vaccine ingredient Thimerosal. Express your vaccine concerns to your doctor and local health officials, and always be sure to research the ingredients before taking any vaccine or medication.
Written and posted by Jessica Cerka in New York
Photo Credit: Jeff Westbrook, as published at marieclaire.com
Sources: marieclaire.com, guardian, ibtimes.com, CDC.gov, fda.gov, Health Sentinal, Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration, Christopher A. Shaw, et al, Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 2009 Aug 20, Pubmed: Delayed effects of neonatal exposure to Tween 80 on female reproductive organs in rats, Pubmed: Hypersensitivity reactions to the polysorbate contained in recombinant erythropoietin and darbepoietin, Polysorbate 80 – Drugs.com, Polysorbate 80 Side Effects, National Toxicology Program, Aluminum and Alzheimer’s disease, a personal perspective after 25 years, Effects of aluminum on the nervous system and its possible link with neurodegenerative diseases.
Disclaimer: The information in this article and on this website is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. None of the products mentioned in this article or on this website are intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. The information in this article is not intended to provide personal medical advice, which should be obtained from a medical professional. This information is made available with the understanding that the author and publisher are not providing medical, psychological, or nutritional counseling services on this site. The information on this Web site does not cover all possible uses, actions, precautions, side effects, and interactions. Liability for individual actions, opinions, or omissions based upon the contents of this site is expressly disclaimed. This information has not been evaluated or approved by the U.S. FDA.